The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
|
at*help still says ATI! - Printable Version +- CBMSTUFF FORUM (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum) +-- Forum: CBMSTUFF PRODUCTS (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: WiModem (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=75) +---- Forum: Firmware (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +---- Thread: at*help still says ATI! (/showthread.php?tid=428) |
RE: at*help still says ATI! - Zeropage - 01-05-2018 Hi Jim These are the commands as I'm sending them(in case it helps). If I were to guess I would say that for whatever reason, the at*b38400 is failing, so the atdt connection string is not sent out. Code: ser_ioctl(1, NULL); RE: at*help still says ATI! - admin - 01-05-2018 I have not tried this yet (I am away at a trade show). It should just work now that I added back support for the ATI command. RE: at*help still says ATI! - scanword - 01-10-2018 (01-05-2018, 01:29 PM)admin Wrote: I have not tried this yet (I am away at a trade show). It should just work now that I added back support for the ATI command. hi tomorrow i have install new firmware 2.20 but the wimodem dont connect to commodore server the connection dont work without that manual not with csload 38 in automatic .... as he did before please tell me what do ok thanks bye RE: at*help still says ATI! - admin - 01-10-2018 Commodore server appears to be down currently. It's back up now! RE: at*help still says ATI! - admin - 01-10-2018 The CSLoad doesn't connect to commodore server, and it doesn't show that it is trying to dial it either. However, I do see: "Device 2 opened ok" and "Device 2 write ok" messages. The formatting for the response messages changed with v2.0 firmware. Would this make a difference? I think I deleted a CR/LF. RE: at*help still says ATI! - scanword - 01-10-2018 (01-10-2018, 12:28 PM)admin Wrote: The CSLoad doesn't connect to commodore server, and it doesn't show that it is trying to dial it either. However, I do see: "Device 2 opened ok" and "Device 2 write ok" messages. The formatting for the response messages changed with v2.0 firmware. Would this make a difference? I think I deleted a CR/LF. Hello thanks for the quick response I just wanted to tell you that I used the same procedure (program) that I used before (csload38) I found on your site cbm now I just do not understand if something is missing or I deleted something but I do not think .. ..beh let me know in the meantime tomorrow afternoon check also csload38 ok thanks hello RE: at*help still says ATI! - Zeropage - 01-11-2018 (01-10-2018, 12:28 PM)admin Wrote: The CSLoad doesn't connect to commodore server, and it doesn't show that it is trying to dial it either. However, I do see: "Device 2 opened ok" and "Device 2 write ok" messages. The formatting for the response messages changed with v2.0 firmware. Would this make a difference? I think I deleted a CR/LF. Hi Jim I dont see why it would.. But that raises another question. Are you expecting a CRLF at the end of the ATDT command ? I'm only sending a line feed (\n). I'll try it with \r\n and see if that makes any difference. RE: at*help still says ATI! - scanword - 01-11-2018 (01-11-2018, 12:10 AM) pid=\2855' Wrote:[quote pid='2853' dateline='1515612507'] [/quote] RE: at*help still says ATI! - Zeropage - 01-11-2018 (01-11-2018, 10:01 AM)scanword Wrote:(01-11-2018, 12:10 AM)pid=\2855 Wrote:[quote pid='2853' dateline='1515612507'] [/quote] Hi csload38 needs to be able to load c64-up2400.ser for the same place as the prg file. I'm not sure how ultimate2 works in that respect RE: at*help still says ATI! - admin - 01-11-2018 (01-11-2018, 12:10 AM)Zeropage Wrote:(01-10-2018, 12:28 PM)admin Wrote: The CSLoad doesn't connect to commodore server, and it doesn't show that it is trying to dial it either. However, I do see: "Device 2 opened ok" and "Device 2 write ok" messages. The formatting for the response messages changed with v2.0 firmware. Would this make a difference? I think I deleted a CR/LF. No, I look for either /r or /n for the line termination. It seems like the PRINT#2 that sends data to the modem is not being accepted, almost like the handshaking is not correct. I changed a LOT of things with v2.00, so I will look into that. |