Missing LF
#12
OK, no offence. I don't have issues, i don't run a BBS software, is more the verbose results reponse format which annoys me. I'm a nostalgic modem collector, i have more then 25 external modems. And all respond to me in the right way. So i say to myself  that all modem cannot be wrong ?
So I did some research and came across the ITU-T V.250 specification which details the AT commands and section 6.2.6 (DCE response format) which explains the format of the result codes, with the ATV0 / ATV1 command as the header format change. It seems to me that you are using the V0 format and not the recommended V1 format. All my modems are in V1.
(Sorry for my bad english)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Missing LF - by Gods - 09-13-2021, 03:08 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-13-2021, 11:47 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-14-2021, 11:26 AM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 09-17-2021, 01:52 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-17-2021, 11:18 AM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 09-18-2021, 10:30 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-18-2021, 02:32 PM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 09-27-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-27-2021, 01:16 PM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 09-30-2021, 12:50 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 09-30-2021, 01:03 PM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 10-01-2021, 01:03 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 10-01-2021, 02:34 AM
RE: Missing LF - by Gods - 10-01-2021, 05:01 AM
RE: Missing LF - by admin - 10-04-2021, 02:11 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)