Non-verbose code discrepancy
#13
The code has worked this way since v2.40. If you are using X1 and V0 together, then the response to connections will be a number. In the case of a 9600 baud connection, it is 12.

There is a brand new firmware update that was just released. I pulled v2.40 because it broke the C64's hardware handshaking. The new version is a complete re-write of the data stream to make it asynchronous. Now outgoing data transfers are full speed.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 01-28-2018, 02:29 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 01-28-2018, 03:12 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 01-28-2018, 03:21 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 01-28-2018, 03:26 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 01-31-2018, 01:07 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 01-31-2018, 05:00 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 01-31-2018, 05:09 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 01-31-2018, 05:13 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 01-31-2018, 06:04 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 02-01-2018, 12:17 AM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 02-01-2018, 12:38 AM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 02-01-2018, 05:16 AM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 02-01-2018, 01:21 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 02-01-2018, 01:48 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 02-01-2018, 04:57 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 02-01-2018, 09:05 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by admin - 02-01-2018, 11:36 PM
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - by Baldrick - 02-02-2018, 05:45 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)