Weird problem writing 'weak flux' pattern
#10
(02-06-2016, 02:35 PM)admin Wrote: You can place the write splice where ever you like.  You don't have to use the index as a reference... however, I do both... by writing more than 1 rev (starting at the index) and terminating the write in an exact location.

Ah, yes makes sense. So to place the splice at offset x, you issue an index-synced write to SCP with x filler at the front and then the real track data.

It's a shame it's not convenient to represent that in a single-revolution-per-track SCP image. A data-starts-at-x, and/or write-splice-is-at-x, field would be handy. As it stands everything is implicitly index-aligned. Unless I'm missing something here too?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Weird problem writing 'weak flux' pattern - by keirf - 02-06-2016, 03:05 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)