Weird problem writing 'weak flux' pattern
Everything is deliberately index referenced as that is the only way to align tracks correctly.  I don't mind that there is more than 1 rev per track in an image.  This actually helps in determining the write splice location, weak bits, strong bits, etc.

I don't use "filler", I use the actual track data.  So, rev 1 is written followed by however much of rev 2 is required.

When only a single rev is needed (Atari ST, PC, etc.) then it is easy enough to calculate the destination drive speed and compress/expand the track data so that the write splice is dead on.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Weird problem writing 'weak flux' pattern - by admin - 02-06-2016, 03:18 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)