12-10-2014, 11:13 AM
How HxC and Aufit display their data depends on how each program interprets the data. HxC has a "hires" mode you can use that makes it much more exact than Aufit, but Aufit2 is suppose to be the same or better. Even so, the dumps done with SCP you posted above clearly show more resolution for the SCP dump. Instead of seeing large blobs of data (wide tracks) you see very small and defined regions with the SCP dump vs. the Kryoflux dump.
The SCP is really no magic hardware.
It's just a hardware capture device that uses a 25ns clock. What comes out of the disk drive is stored exactly. If you push that same data back to a floppy disk controller, it would think there was a real disk drive attached. SCP has the capability to output data and be like the HxC, but I have not completed the firmware yet for that. My hold up really is that I don't have the FAT32 done in assembly yet. Everything else is.
The SCP is really no magic hardware.
It's just a hardware capture device that uses a 25ns clock. What comes out of the disk drive is stored exactly. If you push that same data back to a floppy disk controller, it would think there was a real disk drive attached. SCP has the capability to output data and be like the HxC, but I have not completed the firmware yet for that. My hold up really is that I don't have the FAT32 done in assembly yet. Everything else is.