The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
|
Non-verbose code discrepancy - Printable Version +- CBMSTUFF FORUM (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum) +-- Forum: CBMSTUFF PRODUCTS (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: WiModem232 / WiModem232 Pro (https://www.cbmstuff.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=79) +--- Thread: Non-verbose code discrepancy (/showthread.php?tid=464) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - admin - 02-01-2018 OK, I tested this and it works fine. You just need to enable the extended modes (ATX1) along with turning off the verbose mode (ATV0). RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - Baldrick - 02-01-2018 Sorry, it is not woking how you describe. In fact, thinking that you may have made a firmware update I update it today, but the latest AT*UPDATE downgraded the firmware on my WiModem232 from 2.40 01/28/18 to v2.31 01/16/18 See my actual resultant WiModem232 behaviour here: http://home.ca.inter.net/~henryp/IMG_2952.JPG http://home.ca.inter.net/~henryp/IMG_2953.JPG Baud rate is 9600 as can be seen from the status bar. You'll see the ATV0X1 command followed by a remote connection: 1(ring) 1(ring) 2(connect) Yesterday with the 2.4 I was getting verbose CONNECT 9600 messages but today I'm not, nor am I getting a code 12 for CONNECT 9600 with the ATV0X1 command. RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - admin - 02-01-2018 The code has worked this way since v2.40. If you are using X1 and V0 together, then the response to connections will be a number. In the case of a 9600 baud connection, it is 12. There is a brand new firmware update that was just released. I pulled v2.40 because it broke the C64's hardware handshaking. The new version is a complete re-write of the data stream to make it asynchronous. Now outgoing data transfers are full speed. RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - Baldrick - 02-01-2018 Ok, thank you. I'll try re-updating it and see how it works. Appreciate the response. RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - Baldrick - 02-01-2018 The asynchronous update is pretty good! I think I had asked for something like that in an earlier thread. Now, I hate to be a pest but the latest firmware did not solve the explicit connect speed response issue. I still don't get CONNECT 9600 in verbose mode or code 12 in non verbose mode. Take a look at the command stream here: here is the command stream and a remote connect in verbose mode (ATV1) and extended response on: http://home.ca.inter.net/~henryp/IMG_2958.JPG and here is the exact same command stream and a remove connect in non verbose mode (ATV0) and extended response on (ATX1) http://home.ca.inter.net/~henryp/IMG_2957.JPG Update: I get correct verbose and non-verbose connect codes when dealing out, but not in auto-answer mode as shown in the linked images above. RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - admin - 02-01-2018 Hmm... I will look at the incoming connection. It probably doesn't call the routine to create the message like the ATDx commands do. RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - admin - 02-01-2018 New firmware update to fix this problem! RE: Non-verbose code discrepancy - Baldrick - 02-02-2018 Thanks! It works great in this regard now. |